Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Learning Math Online
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Games to relax

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto  |  Bookstore  |  Contents  |  Amazon store  |  Term index  |  What changed?  |  Contact  |  Recommend
RSS Feed: Recent changes at CTK

Subject: Re: Trigonometry in a triangle
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2000 13:14:10 -0300 (GMT)
From: martin lukarevski

Hi Alexander,

Four years ago a young woman posted following problem:

Can this trigonometric inequality be proved

(1) Sin(A)·Sin(B) / Sin2(C/2) + Sin(B)·Sin(C) / Sin2(A/2) + Sin(C)·Sin(A) / Sin2(B/2) ≠ 9,

where A,B,C are angles in a triangle. I wish to say that this one was the hardest but in the same time the most interesting trigonometric inequality I ever come across. Yes, it can be proved but I believe not directly and not by means.

Let’s start with the proof. At the beginning we will transform (1) in an equivalent form using formulas:

Sin(A) = a / (2·R) and Sin2(A/2) = (a2 - (b – c )2) / ( 4·b·c )

And analogously for the other terms in (1) where a, b, c are the lenghts of the sides of the triangle and R is its circumradius. With this and using R = a·b·c / ( 4·S ), S being the triangle's area , (1) is transformed to:

(2) 1 / ( a2·( a2 – (b – c)2 ) ) + 1 / ( b2·(b2 – (c – a)2 ) + 1/ ( c2·( c2 – (a – b)2 ) ) 9 / (16·S2)

which is still too difficult to be proved. So, another transformation follows. Now we may put:

x = (b + c – a )/2, y = ( c + a – b )/2, z = ( a + b – c )/2

Hence a = y + z, b = z + x, c = x + y, and x = p – a, y = p – b , z = p – c, where p is the semiperimeter of the triangle.

We must bear in mind that a,b,c are sidelengths and therefore x,y,z are all strictly positive. With this and using Heron’s formula

S2 = p·( p – a )·( p – b )·( p – c ),

(2) becomes:

(3) 1 / ( 4·x·y·( x + y )2 ) + 1 / (4·y·z·( y + z )2 ) + 1 / ( 4·z·x·( z + x )2 ) 9 / ( 16·x·y·z·( x + y + z ) )

Eqivalent to (3) is:

(4) K = ( x + y + z )·( x / ( y + z )2 + y / ( z + x )2 + z / ( x + y )2 ) 9 / 4

If we prove (4) for all x,y,z > 0 we are done. For that purpose we will use the following inequality which is standard exercise and can easily be verified:

(*) For all x,y,z > 0, M = x / ( y + z ) + y / ( z + x ) + z / ( x + y ) 3 / 2

And now the last blow. If we use Cauchy-Schwarz-Bunyakovski inequality for the left side of (4) we obtain:

K M2 and M2 9 / 4, so K 9/4.

Q.E.D.

This comletes the proof.

Best regards,
Martin Lukarevski
from Skopje,Macedonia

P.S. I would like to know Alex, what is the source of this problem.

 

 

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

34221668Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK