Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Try our no ads browsing

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Games to relax

Tutor Match Tutoring and Homework Help

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Try our no ads browsing Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Subject: terminology question
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 02:15:57 -0800
From: J Lillge

Hi.

That "cut-the-knot" Web site is great! Nice job!

I have a question about some terminology used in:

    Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

This page presents the following definition:

    "In the beginning there was counting which gave rise to the natural numbers (or integers): 1,2,3, and so on."

The next page (fundamental2.html) also includes statements consistent with this definition, such as:

    "No such integer exists that when added to 20 gives 4. We say that the set of integers is not algebraicly closed."

and:

    "To see how this works let's start with integers (the set N of numbers 1,2,3,...)"

This definition of "integer" is different from the one I am accustomed to. In my research on mathematical terminology consistency, I have come to the following conclusions in this area:

The "cardinal" numbers are:

    The set of the cardinalities of all finite sets. {0,1,2,3,...}

The "positive integer" numbers are:

    The set of the cardinalities of all non-empty finite sets. {1,2,3,...}

The "negative integer" numbers are:

    The set of values for x in the solutions to all equations of the form x+n=0, where n is any "positive integer" number. {-1,-2,-3,...}

The "integer" numbers are:

    The union of the set of "cardinal" numbers and the set of "negative integer" numbers.
    References:
      http://www.pcwebopaedia.com/integer.htm
      http://whatis.com/integer.htm

The "natural" numbers are:

    The same as either the "cardinal" numbers or the "positive integer" numbers, depending on the author.

The "whole" numbers are:

    The same as either the "integer" numbers, the "cardinal" numbers, or the "positive integer" numbers, depending on the author.

Your comments on this significant terminology discrepancy regarding "integer" would be welcome.

----------

J. E. Lillge
Software Architect
Santa Clara Valley California

 

 

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

30863937Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:



Latest on CTK Exchange
try this puzzle ?/?? + ?/?? + ?/? ...
Posted by albert1950
5 messages
12:40 PM, Nov-18-08

Help me find Hisashi ABE, Pythago ...
Posted by likesmath
2 messages
11:11 AM, Oct-06-08

Bearing problem
Posted by Liliya
3 messages
11:32 AM, Nov-27-08

What is the smallest rational sqr ...
Posted by MinusOne
4 messages
04:32 PM, Nov-27-08

Three Concurrent Circles
Posted by billmillar
2 messages
12:26 PM, Oct-28-08

A geometry problem from N.A. Court
Posted by tvarhegyi
7 messages
11:48 AM, Nov-27-08

Error in Fractal Curves and Dimen ...
Posted by miguemate22
1 messages
08:51 AM, Nov-16-08