Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Subject: Re: A cryptarithm
Date: Thu 2/11/99 9:49 AM
From: David L. Arnett

The answer is:

																6 ? ?          6 4 5
          x     ? ? ?    x     7 2 1
        _____________  _____________
                ? ? ?          6 4 5
            ? ? ? ?        1 2 9 0
          ? 5 ? 5        4 5 1 5
        _____________  _____________
          ? ? 5 ? 4 ?    4 6 5 0 4 5

I obtained this solution as follows:

First, I assigned variable names to each unknown digit in the original problem => 6ab x cde. I then went about solving each digit.

Since there are only 3 digits in the first number under the top line, it followed that e must be equal to 1, since anything larger would result in 4 digits. This yielded:

                6 a b
          x     c d 1
        _____________
                6 a b
            ? ? ? ?
          ? 5 ? 5 
        _____________
          ? ? 5 ? 4 b

Since the third number under the top line ends in 5, then either c or b must be 5, and the other number (b or c) must be odd. Trying 5 for c quickly shows no way to obtain the ?5?5 for the third number under the top line, therefore b must be 5 and c must be odd. This yields:

                6 a 5
          x     c d 1
        _____________
                6 a 5
            ? ? ? ?
          ? 5 ? 5 
        _____________
          ? ? 5 ? 4 5

Now to get ?5?5 for the third number under the top line, c must be either 7 or 9. c=9 would work only if a=1, but we can disprove this possibility by realizing that in order to get the 4 in the last line, a+5d must end in a 4, and no integer d will allow this. Therefore, c must be 7 by default. This yields:

                6 a 5
          x     7 d 1
        _____________
                6 a 5
            ? ? ? ?
          4 5 ? 5 
        _____________
          4 ? 5 ? 4 5

In order to get ?5?5 for the third number under the top line, a must be either 4 or 5. Only 4 will satisfy the previously mentioned condition that a+5d must end in a 4, so a must be 4. This yields 645 x 7d1.

                6 4 5
          x     7 d 1
        _____________
                6 4 5
            ? ? ? ?
          4 5 1 5 
        _____________
          4 ? 5 ? 4 5

For the final number (d), we realize that in order for the final number to have a 4 for its second to last digit, d must be even. Plugging in numbers identifies 2 as the correct solution, yielding:

                6 4 5
          x     7 2 1
        _____________
                6 4 5
            1 2 9 0
          4 5 1 5 
        _____________
          4 6 5 0 4 5

It is, of course, debatable whether it was quicker to reason out an answer in this fashion or to write a program to search out all possibilities for the original 5 ?'s above the first line, since there would be only 100,000 variations to try.

Dave Arnett

 

 

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

29284626Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:


Latest on CTK Exchange
calculator suitable for high scho ...
Posted by albert1950
1 messages
10:42 AM, Jun-17-08

Constucting a triangle instructions
Posted by Gerald B.
3 messages
01:32 PM, May-20-08

Missing information
Posted by roboknight
2 messages
07:32 AM, Jun-22-08

An Interesting Formula And Algorithm
Posted by ddixonslc
1 messages
01:44 PM, Jun-19-08

Mistake on the page (an aside, Be ...
Posted by Max
4 messages
10:28 AM, Feb-28-08

Statistical estimation question
Posted by Ralph
2 messages
02:21 PM, Jul-01-08

fusc pseudocode
Posted by azi
1 messages
08:02 PM, Jun-29-08