play and relax: games for kids games
  Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Try our no ads browsing

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Try our no ads browsing Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Subject: Re: Random chewing
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2000 15:40:07 +0000
From: David L. Arnett
Being somewhat foolish in nature, I tackled this one by hand.  I 
started out by methodically  coming up with all possible ways the 
problem could occur, beginning with k=10.  This was easy, as you 
had to have either xxxxxxxxxx or yyyyyyyyyy.  This gives us a 
probability of 2*(1/2)^10.

Next was k=9.  Still easy, but more possibilities:  xxxxxxxxxyx, 
xxxxxxxxyxx,... yxxxxxxxxxx.  The same goes for reversing the 
x's and y's.  This gives us a probability of 20*(1/2)^11 (the extra 1/2 
comes into play as there are now 11 sticks of gum being drawn).

Next was k=8.  Somewhat harder (don't worry, I found a pattern I'll 
get to soon):  xxxxxxxxxyyx, xxxxxxxxyxyx, xxxxxxxxyyxx, 
xxxxxxxyxxyx, xxxxxxxyxyxx,... yyxxxxxxxxxx.  Once again, the 
same goes for reversing the x's and y's.  This gives us a probability 
of (add it up, but don't use your fingers;  you don't have enough) 
110*(1/2)^12.

For k=7, the same work provided 440*(1/2)^13.

OK, I'm tired of reversing the x's and y's.  Let's drop the factor of 2 
by simultaneously lowering the exponent of the (1/2) terms by 1.  
Think about it, it works.

This gives us (1/2)^9, 10*(1/2)^10, 55*(1/2)^11, and 220*(1/2)^12 for 
k=10, 9, 8, and 7, respectively.

As I went through the possibilities, I also noticed the pattern I was 
using could be duplicated mathematically by determining the 
multiplier as follows:

For k=8:  Sum(a=1,10){a} = 1+2+3+...+10 = 55

For k=7:  Sum(a=1,10){Sum(b=1,a){b}} = 
(1)+(1+2)+(1+2+3)+...+(1+2+3+...+10) = 220

This technique can be continued through k=1.

As for the exponents, they simply increase by 1 for each value of k.

This gives us final results of:

k=10:      1*(1/2)^9 = 0.001953125
k=9:     10*(1/2)^10 = 0.009765625
k=8:     55*(1/2)^11 = 0.02685546875
k=7:    220*(1/2)^12 = 0.0537109375
k=6:    715*(1/2)^13 = 0.0872802734375
k=5:   2002*(1/2)^14 = 0.122192382812
k=4:   5005*(1/2)^15 = 0.152740478516
k=3: 11,440*(1/2)^16 = 0.174560546875
k=2: 24,310*(1/2)^17 = 0.185470581055
k=1: 48,620*(1/2)^18 = 0.185470581055
                      ---------------
(Check)        Total = 1

An interesting note:  it is possible to come up with the sums for the 
multipliers easily by hand in the following manner (trust me, I didn't 
just plug through that many nested sums):

for k=9, we have (for each possible order):

    1  +  1  +  1  +  1  +  1  +  1  +  1  +  1  +  1  +  1  =  10

Now, start with 1 and add the corresponding number from the k=9 
sequence to obtain the next number in the k=8 sequence (in this 
case, all the numbers added are one):

    1  +  2  +  3  +  4  +  5  +  6  +  7  +  8  +  9  + 10  =  55

For k=7, we start with 1, add 2, then add 3, etc. (numbers from the 
k=8 sequence):

    1  +  3  +  6  + 10  + 15  + 21  + 28  + 36  + 45  + 55  =  220

For k=6, we get:

    1  +  4  + 10  + 20  + ...

and so on.

Why does the probability of k=1 equal the probability of k=2?  
Because the multiplier for k=1 is twice the multiplier for k=2, and 
the exponent for the (1/2) term is raised by one, cancelling each 
other out.  Why is that?  I have no idea.  Anyone?

 

 

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

29713766Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:


Latest on CTK Exchange
try this puzzle ?/?? + ?/?? + ?/? ...
Posted by albert1950
2 messages
03:40 PM, Aug-26-08

Numbers raised to the power of 0
Posted by Chris Tolley
20 messages
12:17 PM, Aug-25-08

Arbelos : 1) Geometrical Construc ...
Posted by Sundar Krishnan
12 messages
06:29 AM, Aug-12-08

concerning pi
Posted by Lloyd Marks
4 messages
08:25 AM, Aug-22-08

Triangles With Equal Area
Posted by Bui Quang Tuan
5 messages
07:20 PM, Aug-26-08

Coxeter Introduction to Geometry
Posted by WiZaRd
1 messages
09:15 AM, Aug-23-08

site questions
Posted by madisonv
2 messages
04:24 PM, Aug-26-08