Lemma 2
For n > 4, then An is generated by various pairs of non-intersecting transpositions (ab)(cd), where {a,b}
{c,d}=
.
Proof
The Lemma is obvious since an even permutation is a product of an even number of transpositions.
Thus we need only consider products (ab)(cd) of two transpositions that perhaps have common elements. If, say, b = c, choose x and y other than a, b, c, or d. Then (ab)(cd) = [(ab)(xy)][(cd)(xy)].
Lemma 3
An is generated by all 3-cycles (abc).
Actually a stronger result holds, viz., An is generated by all 3-cycles (abc) with fixed (but arbitrary) a and b.
Proof
Let a = 1 and b = 2 and let's prove that An is generated by the set {(12c)}. The proof is by induction on n. The result obviously holds
for n = 3. Thus assume n>3.
Let f
An and nf = m. Then
g = (12n)(12m)-1f is an even permutation. Also, ng = n. Therefore,
we may look at g as belonging to An-1. By the inductive hypothesis g is a product of 3-cycles (12c)
and so is f.
Definition
Let S be a subgroup of S(X). S is said to be transitive if for all x,y
X
there exists f
S(X) such that xf = y. If for any x1,...,xk,y1,...,yk
X
there exists f
S such that xi f = yi f, for i=1,...,k, the group S is
said to be k-transitive. 1-transitive group is transitive.
Definition
For f
S(X), support of f
is defined as supp(f) = {x
X: xf
x}.
Support of f is the set of points not fixed by f. If supp(f)
Y
X,
then (restricted to Y) f may be looked at as an element of S(Y). With this in mind, for a subgroup T
S(X),
we write T|Y = {f
T: supp(f)
Y} considered as a subgroup of S(Y).
Lemma 4 [Wilson]
Let T be a set of 3-cycles on X, card(X) = n>2, and let <T> denote the subgroup of S(X) generated
by T. Then the following are equivalent:
- <T> = A(X).
- <T> is transitive.
Proof
First of all, it's clear that (i) implies (ii). To prove the reverse, assume T is given satisfying (ii). Then let Y
be a subset of X such that card(Y)>2, <T>|Y = A(Y), and which is maximal with respect
to these properties. We claim that Y = X (which will prove the lemma.)
If Y
X, our assumption (ii) implies that either:
- there exists a 3-cycle (uvz)
T with u,v
Y, z
Y; or
- there exists a 3-cycle (uvz)
T with z
Y, u,v
Y.
In case (a), <T> contains (uvx), x
Y-{u,v}, in addition to (uvz), so
<T>|(Y
{z}) = A(Y
{z}) by Lemma 3.
In case (b), for each x
Y, <T>|Y contains
a permutation f such that z f = x. Then f -1(uvz)f = (uvx)
<T>.
This holds for every x
Y and hence <T>|(Y
{u,v}) = A(Y
{u,v}) by Lemma 3.
Again, the maximality of Y is contradicted.