Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Reciprocal links
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Σ2-n = Σn·2-n

Admitedly, this is a strange identity to contemplate: every term at the right is greater than the corresponding term on the left. How then the identity is possible?

The identity becomes more plausible with the remark that the summation on both sides starts with n = 0:

(1) Σn = 0 2-n = Σn = 0 n·2-n

which effectively kills the first term on the right. This becomes transparent if we write the series explicitly:

(1') 1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... = 0·1 + 1·1/2 + 2·1/4 + 3·1/8 + ...

Is it now less surprising?

We shall assume that the two series converge. (This is shown by the means taught in the beginning Calculus course. We skip this here. The point is however similar to that made in the discussion of the identity 0.999 ... = 1. In the presence of convergence simple algebraic manipulations of a series lead to valid results that may not be true for the divergent series.)

Thus denote

  S = 1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... and
T = 1/2 + 2/4 + 3/8 + ...

It's actually more convenient to work with the summation symbol Σ:

 
T= 1/2 + 2/4 + 3/8 + ...
 = Σn = 0 n·2-n
 = Σn = 1 n·2-n
 = Σn = 1 (n - 1)·2-n + Σn = 1 2-n
 = ½Σn = 1 (n - 1)·2-(n-1) + ½Σn = 1 2-(n-1)
 = ½Σn = 0 n·2-n + ½Σn = 0 2-n
 = ½S + ½T.

Which implies

  S = S/2 + T/2, or S/2 = T/2

proving the promised S = T. As S is the sum of a geometric series with the factor q = 1/2,

 
S= 1 / (1 - q)
 = 1 / (1 - 1/2)
 = 1 / 1/2
 = 2.

Therefore, 2 = S = T.

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

28696300Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:


Latest on CTK Exchange
Math
Posted by Laura
2 messages
06:56 AM, Apr-15-08

Divisibility rules - Jargon buste ...
Posted by Carolyn
2 messages
08:35 AM, Apr-04-08

drawing puzzle
Posted by martin gran
31 messages
06:53 PM, May-09-08

Distance to the horizon
Posted by Monty
3 messages
04:38 PM, May-08-08

Mistake on the page (an aside, Be ...
Posted by Max
4 messages
10:28 AM, Feb-28-08

Deriving functions based on diffe ...
Posted by ke_45
1 messages
12:47 PM, May-10-08

A typo in
Posted by alexwajn
1 messages
11:36 PM, Apr-19-08