Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Ask a tutor for free
Learning Math Online

Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto  |  Bookstore  |  Contents  |  Amazon store  |  Term index  |  What changed?  |  Contact  |  Recommend
RSS Feed: Recent changes at CTK

A. Bogomolny

Following is the diagram I used in one of the emails to W. McWorter as an argument in support of the claim that there must exist some kind of factorization that leads to a variety of finite quasigroups.

It's not at all obvious (and in fact, at the time, it was not obvious to me) what that diagram had to do with the claim. In hindsight, I can see three elements, say, a1, b1, c1, such that b1 * a1 = c1. Assume each of the three elements changes over a triangular subgrid (signified, for element a1, by the triangle a1a2a3). The subgrids over which elements a1, b1, c1 change do not coincide, but are isomorphic (which may be surmised from the congruence of triangles a1a2a3, b1b2b3, and c1c2c3.) What the verbal part of my message says is that the identity b1 * a1 = c1 holds "subgrid wise".

It's to Professor McWorter's credit that he developed the right idea from a vague representation of an obscure intuition.

Freaky Links

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

34384258Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK