Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Ask a tutor for free
Learning Math Online

Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto  |  Bookstore  |  Contents  |  Amazon store  |  Term index  |  What changed?  |  Contact  |  Recommend
RSS Feed: Recent changes at CTK

Paradoxes of Infinity

Infinity is not a simple concept. Unless a care is exercised, especially when dealing with infinity as if it was a common number, paradoxes arise readily.

For example, the sum of a finite set of numbers is well defined and does not depend on the order in which the numbers are added up:

 1= 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + 1
  = 1 - (1 - 1 + 1 - 1)
  = (1 - 1) + (1 - 1 + 1)
  = 1 + 1 + 1 - 1 - 1
  = 1 + 1 + 1 - (1 + 1)
     etc.

Regrouping of the terms does not change the result. However, it is a well known fact that the infinite sum 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + ... could not possibly be ascribed any reasonable value because regrouping of the terms in an infinite sum may lead to entirely unpredictable results.

Similarly, expressions like ∞ / ∞ or ∞ - ∞ are best left undefined.

In the ancient times, Zeno of Elea (5th BC) came up with a few paradoxes that have been debated ever since.

In the medieval times, philosophers stumbled on the difficulty of thinking of a line as an infinite collection of points. On one hand, it looked like a longer segment should contain more points than a longer one. On the other hand, any two line segments are easily set into a 1-1 correspondence, implying that they have the same number of points. So it appeared as if there were two infinities that were simultaneously different and equal. (Galileo tried to resolve the paradox by allowing infinitesimal gaps between the points.)

Hotel Infinity - even when full - is ever ready to accommodate new arrivals.

Now imagine the surface of revolution obtained by revolving the hyperbola y = 1/x around the x-axis. Think of the resulting a horn-like shape restricted to x ≥ 1. It can be shown that such a surface has an infinite area but encloses a finite volume. At first sight it may not look like a big deal, but with one more effort, imagine having to paint the surface area. Surely, faced with that task, one would need an infinite amount of paint which seems to constitute an unsurmountable obstruction to fulfillment of the job. However, ingenuity comes to the rescue. Fill a pail equal in volume to that enclosed by the revolving hyperbola and pour the paint into the horn opening. Naturally, the paint will fill the horn and simultaneously paint its surface.

We shall discuss some of these issues on separate pages.

References

  1. E. Maor, To Infinity and Beyond, Princeton University Press, 1991, p. 84.
  2. R. Rucker, Infinity and the Mind, Princeton University Press, 1995, p. 5.

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

34383162Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK