play and relax: games for kids games
  Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Try our no ads browsing

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Games to relax

Tutor Match Tutoring and Homework Help

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Try our no ads browsing Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Order. Well-ordered sets

A binary relation R on a set X is a subset of the product X×X. Very often instead of writing, say, (x, y)R we write xRy. A binary relation may have many properties; the ones of interest for the definition of order are listed below (I'll omit the expression "for all x" or "for all y". The properties listed are assumed to hold for all elements from R):

 Reflexivity: xRx
 Symmetry: if xRy then yRx
 Antisymmetry: if xRy and yRx then x = y
 Asymmetry: if xRy then not yRx
 Transitivity: if xRy and yRz then xRz
 Totality: either xRy or yRx
 Density: xRy implies existence of z such that xRz and zRy

A relation which is reflexive, symmetric and transitive is an equivalence relation. The one which is reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive is a partial order. The one which is antisymmetric, transitive and total is a total (or linear) order. A total order is partial because totality implies reflexivity.

A set X along with a binary relation R is said to be partially (totally) ordered if R is a partial (total) order. A partially ordered set is called poset. (Strangely enough, a totally ordered set is not called toset.)

When it comes to considering ordered sets, the partial order relation R is usually written as "≤". Alongside a partial order "≤" it is common and convenient to work with a relation "<" defined as

 x < y iff x ≤ y and x ≠ y.

The relation "<" is irreflexive, asymmetric and transitive.

If A is a subset of a poset X and aA is such that, for every element bA, a≤b, then a is called the minimum (or the least) element of A. The minimum element, if exists, is unique because of the antisymmetry of the partial order.

A totally ordered set in which every non-empty subset has a minimum element is called well-ordered. A finite set with a total order is well-ordered. All total orderings of a finite set are, in a sense, the same. This is not true of the infinite sets. The countable transfinite ordinals correspond to various well-orderings of the set N of natural numbers.

Two sets X and Y totally ordered by relations R and S are said to be similar if they are of the same cardinality (|X| = |Y|) and there exists an order-preserving 1-1 correspondence f: X→Y between them:

 f(x)Sf(y) iff xRy.

Similar sets are said to be of the same order-type.

Examples

  • The set of all subsets of a set with more than one element is partially ordered by inclusion.
  • The set of natural numbers is naturally well ordered by the magnitude of the numbers. This ordering is denoted ω.
  • Sarkovskii's ordering of natural numbers is total but any infinite subset of powers of 2 has no minimum element.
  • The set of rational numbers is naturally totally ordered but not well ordered; the ordering is dense.
  • The set of real numbers is naturally totally ordered but not well ordered; the ordering is dense.
  • Lexicographic order is total for sequences and complex numbers.
  • The set of negative integers does not have a minimum element and is not, therefore, similar to the set of positive integers.

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

30725011Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:



Latest on CTK Exchange
try this puzzle ?/?? + ?/?? + ?/? ...
Posted by albert1950
5 messages
12:40 PM, Nov-18-08

Help me find Hisashi ABE, Pythago ...
Posted by likesmath
2 messages
11:11 AM, Oct-06-08

triangle construction
Posted by Elianto84
12 messages
07:06 PM, Oct-30-08

Gardner's Torus cutting puzzle... ...
Posted by itineracy
3 messages
11:22 PM, Nov-02-08

Three Concurrent Circles
Posted by billmillar
2 messages
12:26 PM, Oct-28-08

disjoint sets
Posted by jay_shark
0 messages
07:36 PM, Nov-13-08

Error in Fractal Curves and Dimen ...
Posted by miguemate22
1 messages
08:51 AM, Nov-16-08