Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Math & English enrichment at SchoolPlus-Online
HoodaMath: games and movies
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Games to relax

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Following is an excerpt from
MATHEMATICS: The Science of Patterns
by Keith Devlin

The nineteenth-century English mathematician John Venn invented a simple, geometric method for checking the validity of syllogisms, known nowadays as the method of Venn diagrams. In Venn's method, the syllogism is represented by means of three overlapping circles, as shown. The idea is that the region inside the circle marked S represents all objects of type S, and analogously for circles marked P and M. The procedure used to verify the syllogism is to see what the two premises say about various regions in the diagram, numbered 1 to 7.

To illustrate the method, consider the simple example given in the text, namely, the syllogism

    
                 MaP
                 SaM
                 ---
                 SaP

The major premise, All M are P, says that regions 3 and 5 are empty. (All the objects in M are in P, that is to say, are in the regions marked 2 and 4.) The minor premise, All S are M, says that regions 1 and 7 are empty. Thus, the combined effect of the two premises is to say that regions 1, 3, 5, and 7 are empty.

The goal now is to construct a proposition involving S and P that is consistent with this information about the various regions. Regions 1, 3, and 7 are empty, so anything in S Must be in region 4, and is therefore in P. In other words, all S are P. And that verifies this particular syllogism.

Though not all syllogisms are as easy to analyze as this example, all the other valid syllogisms can be verified in the same way.

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

33067049Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK