Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Math & English enrichment at SchoolPlus-Online
HoodaMath: games and movies
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Games to relax

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Problem

Given a 1x1 square. Is it possible to put into it not intersecting circles so that the sum of their radii will be 1996?

Solution

It's an interesting problem. The number 1996 looks pretty much random and irrelevant. Chances are that either the problem in solvable for 1996 or it is solvable for other and larger numbers as well. Let us experiment. Start with simple configurations. If there is just one circle, how big its radius could be? 1/2. If my purpose at this point is to gain an insight into the problem, what simple configurations can I use? 2 circles? The result will be a half of the square's diagonal - .

So I'll skip the case of three circles. Take four. Here's one possible configuration. The sum of radii is 1. In three experiments we obtained an increasing sequence of numbers: 1/2, , and 1. It may pay to continue with our experiment using simple configurations. Looking at the two pictures, it was easy to find the radius of a circle when it was inscribed into a square. First, it was the original 1x1 square. The last time, we had 4 smaller squares of the size 1/2x1/2 each. Dividing the square into nine 1/3x1/3 squares we'll get the sum of radii 1/6*9 = 3/2 - a new increase. With 16 squares the sum will be 1/8*16=2. With n2 small squares, the sum will become 1/(2n)*n2=n/2.

Since n can be chosen arbitrary large there is no limit to the sum of radii of the circles packed into a 1x1 square.

Follow up

Let us replace the square with other shapes. Say, consider a circle of radius 1. Is it possible to put into a circle of radius 1 a number of not intersecting circles so that the sum of their radii will be 1996? Sounds amazing, right. My first attempt was to divide the circle into rings - something similar to dividing the square into narrow rectangles. But this compromised expected simplicity of the solution.

Still I was sure that the problems are somehow related and it should be possible to apply one when solving another. The solution is even more immediate than I first thought. First inscribe a square into the circle. Then solve the previous problem for the square thus obtained.

With this it becomes clear that the problem can be meaningfully formulated for various container shapes and for different small ones that should pack the given container.

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

33062389Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK