Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Reciprocal links
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Problem

Given a 1x1 square. Is it possible to put into it not intersecting circles so that the sum of their radii will be 1996?

Solution

It's an interesting problem. The number 1996 looks pretty much random and irrelevant. Chances are that either the problem in solvable for 1996 or it is solvable for other and larger numbers as well. Let us experiment. Start with simple configurations. If there is just one circle, how big its radius could be? 1/2. If my purpose at this point is to gain an insight into the problem, what simple configurations can I use? 2 circles? The result will be a half of the square's diagonal - .

So I'll skip the case of three circles. Take four. Here's one possible configuration. The sum of radii is 1. In three experiments we obtained an increasing sequence of numbers: 1/2, , and 1. It may pay to continue with our experiment using simple configurations. Looking at the two pictures, it was easy to find the radius of a circle when it was inscribed into a square. First, it was the original 1x1 square. The last time, we had 4 smaller squares of the size 1/2x1/2 each. Dividing the square into nine 1/3x1/3 squares we'll get the sum of radii 1/6*9 = 3/2 - a new increase. With 16 squares the sum will be 1/8*16=2. With n2 small squares, the sum will become 1/(2n)*n2=n/2.

Since n can be chosen arbitrary large there is no limit to the sum of radii of the circles packed into a 1x1 square.

Follow up

Let us replace the square with other shapes. Say, consider a circle of radius 1. Is it possible to put into a circle of radius 1 a number of not intersecting circles so that the sum of their radii will be 1996? Sounds amazing, right. My first attempt was to divide the circle into rings - something similar to dividing the square into narrow rectangles. But this compromised expected simplicity of the solution.

Still I was sure that the problems are somehow related and it should be possible to apply one when solving another. The solution is even more immediate than I first thought. First inscribe a square into the circle. Then solve the previous problem for the square thus obtained.

With this it becomes clear that the problem can be meaningfully formulated for various container shapes and for different small ones that should pack the given container.

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

28737578Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:


Latest on CTK Exchange
Math
Posted by Laura
2 messages
06:56 AM, Apr-15-08

Divisibility rules - Jargon buste ...
Posted by Carolyn
2 messages
08:35 AM, Apr-04-08

drawing puzzle
Posted by martin gran
31 messages
06:53 PM, May-09-08

conway's game of life
Posted by frequency
0 messages
11:52 PM, May-12-08

Mistake on the page (an aside, Be ...
Posted by Max
4 messages
10:28 AM, Feb-28-08

Deriving functions based on diffe ...
Posted by ke_45
1 messages
12:47 PM, May-10-08

Josephus Flavius (correction)
Posted by David Turner
1 messages
09:42 AM, May-14-08