Search


 

 

Read This

The Next Generation: What can we do now?
Each day we see more violence on the news, less money being allocated to our education system and more kids becoming addicted to video games, T.V and food. Sometimes we hear comments such as "if only we could go back to the good old days". But the...

Your Words Matter
Amidst much groaning and moaning, we carried one of our two kayaks from the bayside of the key to the beach—two hundred yards of sweat and hand chafing. Loaded down with paddles and life preservers, we herded the kids to water’s edge. ...

Public Schools Perform Near Private Ones in Study
The Education Department reported on Friday that children in public schools generally performed as well or better in reading and mathematics than comparable children in private schools. The exception was in eighth-grade reading, where the private school counterparts fared better.

 
Google

Study: School tests aim too low

By Denise Smith Amos

Ohio and other states are aiming too low on some state school tests, painting an unreliable picture of academic achievement and setting up elementary students to fail, a new study by the Fordham Institute says.

The study, called "The Proficiency Illusion," was released this morning.

It says that No Child Left Behind's mandated tests on math and reading create a false impression of success, especially in reading and especially in the early grades, in the 26 states studied in the report.

"America is awash in achievement 'data,' yet the truth about our educational performance is far from transparent and trustworthy. It may be smoke and mirrors," the study says.

Federal education law requires that all students be proficient in reading and math by 2014, but states define what proficiency is.

Each states sets its academic standards and designs its tests and scoring methods, including the required number of points to pass a test - called a cut score.

Fordham's study says states, including Ohio, are setting the cut scores too low and too inconsistently to accurately gauge how students are progressing.

Ohio's reading and math cut scores ranked among the lower half of the 26 states examined, the report says.

But Ohio officials say that the report's methodology is "fairly suspect." Fordham's methods can't accurately assess one state's tests against another's.

"We have a lot of apples and oranges here, " said Stan Heffner, associate superintendent of curriculum assessment for the Ohio Department of Education.

Low cut scores on a test means students can miss many questions and still pass, or be considered proficient.

Heffner said that Ohio's tests are difficult, perhaps more than other states, so lower cut scores reflect that.


From the Cincinnati Inquirer, Wednesday, October 3, 2007. See http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071003/NEWS01/310030046