play and relax: games for kids games
  Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Try our no ads browsing

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Try our no ads browsing Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Perpendicular Bisectors in an Inscriptible Quadrilateral: What is this about?
A Mathematical Droodle


This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet
What if applet does not run?

Discussion

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The applet may suggest the following statement [de Villiers]:

  Given a qudrilateral ABCD, the perpendicular bisectors of its sidelines form a quadrilateral A1B1C1D1. If ABCD is inscriptible, then so is A1B1C1D1.


This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet
What if applet does not run?

The applet is suggestive of a statement but does not seem to help with finding a proof. The theorem could be derived from a similar theorem concerned with angles bisectors. A presentation of the proof with a different illustration appears elsewhere. Below, I give a proof kindly supplied to me by M. de Villiers. The proof is included in his book Some Adventures in Euclidean Geometry and was suggested by Jordan Tabov.

I apologize for a change of notations.

 

As seen in the diagram, the given quadrilateral ABCD is inscriptible. X, Y, Z, W are the midpoints of the sides AD, AB, BC, and CD, respectively. HY AB, HZ BC, FX AD, and FW CD. E is the point of intersection HY and FX, G is the intersection of FW and HZ, and M is the intersection of FX nc CD.

We want to show that the quadrilateral EFGH is inscriptible. Let AB = a, BC = b, CD = c, and DA = d. tA is the tangent from A to the incircle. tB, tC, tD are defined similarly. Assume the radius of the incircle equals 1.

We now have:

(1) 2·MD = -d/cosD,
2·MW = c - d/cosD,
2·FW = 2·MW·cot(180o - D) = d/sinD - c·cotD.

Similarly

(2) 2·FX = c/sinD - d·cotD.

Hence

(3)
2(FX - FW) = (c-d)/sinD + (c-d)cotD
  = (c-d)(1 + cosD)/sinD
  = (c-d)cot(D/2)
  = (c-d)tD/r
  = (c-d)tD.

Simialrly for 2(HZ - HY), 2(EY - EX) and 2(GW - GZ). We now have to check that the sums of the opposite sides of EFGH are equal, or alternatively that

  EF - EH + HG - GF = 0,

which is the same as

  (FX-EX) - (HY-EY) + (HZ-GZ) - (FW-GW) = 0.

Rearranging the terms and multiplying by 2 gives

(4) 2(FX - FW) + 2(HZ - HY) + 2(EY - EX) + 2(GW - GZ) = 0.

In view of (3), (4) is equivalent to

(5) (c - d)tD + (d - a)tA + (a - b)tB + (b - c)tC = 0.

Since ABCD is inscriptible, c - d = b - a and, equivalently, d - a = c - b. With this in mind equation (5) becomes

(6) (c - d)(tD - tB) + (d - a)(tA - tC) = 0.

But

  c - d = (tC + tD) - (tD) + tA) = tC - tA.

and similarly

  d - a = tD - tB.

Therefore (6) is equivalent to

  (tC - tA)(tD - tB) + (tD - tB)(tA - tC) = 0.

which is an identity and completes the proof.

(A zipped Sketchpad sketch is available for download.)

References

  1. M. de Villiers, Private communication, Dec. 2004
  2. M. de Villiers, Some Adventures in Euclidean Geometry, Univ. of Durban-Westville, 1994 (revised 1996), pp. 192-193

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

29713910Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:


Latest on CTK Exchange
try this puzzle ?/?? + ?/?? + ?/? ...
Posted by albert1950
2 messages
03:40 PM, Aug-26-08

Numbers raised to the power of 0
Posted by Chris Tolley
20 messages
12:17 PM, Aug-25-08

Arbelos : 1) Geometrical Construc ...
Posted by Sundar Krishnan
12 messages
06:29 AM, Aug-12-08

concerning pi
Posted by Lloyd Marks
4 messages
08:25 AM, Aug-22-08

Triangles With Equal Area
Posted by Bui Quang Tuan
5 messages
07:20 PM, Aug-26-08

Coxeter Introduction to Geometry
Posted by WiZaRd
1 messages
09:15 AM, Aug-23-08

site questions
Posted by madisonv
2 messages
04:24 PM, Aug-26-08