Weitzenböck's Inequality
The applet below illustrates a geometric proof of Weitzenböck's Inequality. For any triangle ABC with sides a, b, c, and the area S,
This wonderful geometric proof is due to C. Alsina and R. B. Nelsen.
| |
|
References
- C. Alsina and R. B. Nelsen, Geometric Proofs of Weitzenböck and Hadwiger-Finsler Inequalities, Mathematics Magazine, v. 81, No. 3, June 2008, pp.216-219
Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny
Theorem
For any triangle ABC with sides a, b, c, and the area S,
Proof
Form, on the sides of ΔABC, Napoleon triangles, ABC', BCA', CAB'. For a triangle with all angles less than 120°, the three lines AA', BB', CC' concur at Fermat's point of the triangle. The point solves the minimization problem: for all points X, XA + XB + XC attends its minimum at F. If one of the angles is greater or equal to 120° Fermat's point lies at the corresponding vertex.
Multiply (1) by √3/4. The inequality becomes
where Sa is the area of ΔBCA', etc.
| |
|
In fact, a stronger result holds. Let F be interior to ΔABC, with distances x, y, z to A, B, C, respectively. Let Sk denote the area of an equilateral triangle with side k. Then
| (3) |
Sa + Sb + Sc = 3S + S|x - y| + S|y - z| + S|z - x|.
|
To see that (3) holds, observe that F splits ΔABC into three triangles each with angle 120° at F. This shows that the remaining angles in each triangle add up to 60°. It follows that three copies of each of the triangles fit into the corresponding equilateral triangle leaving equilateral triangles with sides |x - y|, |y - z|, and |z - x|.
When F coincides with, say, vertex C, then
| (4) |
Sa + Sb + Sc ≥ Sc ≥ 3S.
|
Stronger than (1) is the Hadwiger-Finsler inequality: if a, b, c are the sides of a triangle with area S then
| (5) |
a² + b² + c² ≥ 4√3S + (a - b)² + (b - c)² + (c - a)².
|
In terms of areas, the latter is equivalent to
| (6) |
Sa + Sb + Sc ≥ 3S + S|a - b| + S|b - c| + S|c - a|.
|
In case F is internal to ΔABC, this inequality is a consequence of (3) because
To prove these, assume a ≥ b ≥ c. Then by reflecting the triangle with sides b, x, z in the segment z leads to the following configuration:
The triangle inequality (in the yellow triangle) then implies y - x ≥ a - b. The other two inequalities are established similarly. Thus from (3)
| |
Sa + Sb + Sc | = 3S + S|x - y| + S|y - z| + S|z - a| |
| |
| ≥ 3S + S|a - b| + S|b - c| + S|c - a|. |
In case where, say, angle C is 120° or more so that F coincides with C, z = 0, x = b and y = a. The inequality in (4) is refined to
| |
Sa + Sb + Sc ≥ 3S + S|a - b| + Sa + Sb.
|
Now observe that a ≥ |b - c| and b ≥ |c - a| from which, again, (6) follows.
Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny
|