Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Learning Math Online
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Games to relax

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto  |  Bookstore  |  Contents  |  Amazon store  |  Term index  |  What changed?  |  Contact  |  Recommend
RSS Feed: Recent changes at CTK

Squares on Sides of a Quadrilateral: What is this about?
A Mathematical Droodle


This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet
What if applet does not run?

Discussion

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion

Erect similarly oriented squares on the sides of a quadrilateral ABCD. Denote their centers successively O1, O2, O3, and O4. Then

(1) O1O3 = O2O4 and
(2) O1O3 O2O4.

Proof

Let M be the midpoint of AC. By the Finsler-Hadwiger theorem,

  MO1 = MO2 and
  MO1 MO2

and also

  MO3 = MO4 and
  MO3 MO4.

Therefore, triangles MO1O3 and MO2O4 are equal and one is a rotation of the other through 90o. Hence, (1) and (2) hold.

Remark

  1. If any two adjacent vertices of a quadrilateral coalesce into a point, the statement just proven becomes a property of the Bride's Chair configuration.

  2. The theorem we just proved is attributed to Van Aubel (Von Aubel in [Gardner, p. 176-178]) could also be found in [de Villiers, Yaglom, Finney] among others.

  3. The argument falls through in case one of O1O3 or O2O4 is of zero length. This case is considered elsewhere. There it is shown that the two distances are either both 0 or not. The former case occurs iff the diagonals of the quadrilateral are equal and perpendicular.

References

  1. E. J. Barbeau, M. S. Klamkin, W. O. J. Moser, Five Hundred Mathematical Challenges, MAA, 1995, #320b
  2. M. de Villiers, The Role of Proof in Investigative, Computer-based Geometry: Some Personal Reflections, in Geometry Turned On, MAA Notes 41, 1997, pp. 15-24
  3. R. L. Finney, Dynamic Proofs of Euclidean Theorems, Math Magazine, 43, pp. 177-185.
  4. M. Gardner, Mathematical Circus, Vintage, 1981
  5. I. M. Yaglom, Geometric Transformations I, MAA, 1962

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

34222189Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK