Malfatti's Problem, Hart's ProofMalfatti's 200 years old problem
has a curious history, with a milestone in 1826 when J. Steiner published his solution without proof. There are many proofs of Steiner's construction, see, for example, references at the bottom of the page. Below, I shall follow Hart's solution (1856) found in [Coolidge]. The proof introduces an unusual (for discussions at this site) amount of points, lines, and circles. Which suggests that there may be a benefit in changing notations. The base triangle will be denoted A1A2A3, with a heavier use of indices compared to a more standard ABC. In Steiner's construction and Hart's solution, geometric elements come in triples related to the three vertices. Three distinct indices involved will be denoted i, j, k, with an implied order. In Steiner's construction, the incenter I of ΔA1A2A3 plays an important role:
ProofAssuming Malfatti's problem solved, two of the circles touch AiAj. There point of contact is denoted Pk. Their common tangent through Pk meets AiAj in Dk. The points of contact with AiAj are Bk, Ck, as in the applet below. The line DkPk is the radical axes of the two circles; three such lines meet in the radical center of the three circles, which we denote L. Each of the lines DkPk crosses the perimeter of triangle A1A2A3 in a point Ek different from Dk. Which side Ek lies on -- either Aki or Ajk -- depends on a specific configuration. To be specific, we shall assume that E1 and E3 lie on A1A3. Then
It therefore appears that D2 is the point of contact of the incircle of ΔA1LA3 with A1A3. This fact actually does not depend on whether points E1 and E3 lie between A1 and A3 and holds equally well in other configurations. Thus it holds for each of the three triangles with the side lines LEi, LEk, and EkEi. The Malfatti circle inscribed into this triangle touches LEi in Fi, LEk in Gk, and, as we agreed before, EkEi in Dj. Note that
Hence, the second common tangent of the two circles goes through A1, and similar considerations apply to the other two vertices. Further,
We see then that the points D2 and D3 on the incircles D2F1G3 and D3F2G1 have equal tangent segments with respect to the other circle. The tangents at these points therefore meet on the circle of similitude of the two circles D2F1G3 and D3F2G1. The tangents being A1D2 and A1D3, we conclude that A1 lies on the circle of similitude of the two circles D2F1G3 and D3F2G1. By a property of the circle of similitude, the line from A1 to the internal center of similarity of the two circles bisects the vertex angle A1. But, as we have seen, this line is tangent to the circles D2F1G3 and D3F2G1. We conclude that the bisector of the vertex angle at A1 is one of the common tangents the circles D2F1G3 and D3F2G1. It follows that the circle DjFiGk is inscribed into triangle AiLAk. Thus, if Malfatti's problem has a solution, the solution can be obtained by Steiner's construction. Up to this point, the derivation was relatively elementary, if not simple. Now I quote verbatim from Coolidge (p. 176):
This argument, although simple, is well beyond elementary. The argument depends on the notion of continuity and the Intermediate Value Theorem to be made rigorous. References
|Activities| |Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Geometry| |Store| Copyright © 1996-2012 Alexander Bogomolny |
| 40608195 |

