Equilic Quadrilateral I: What is this about?
A Mathematical Droodle
| |
|
Discussion
Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny
The applet may suggest the following statement due to Jack Garfunkel [Honsberger]:
| |
If an equilateral triangle DCQ is drawn on the side DC (away from AB) of an equilic quadrilateral ABCD (AD = BC), then the triangle ABQ is also equilateral.
|
(To remind, a quadrilateral ABCD is called equilic if it has a pair of equal opposite sides inclined 60° to each other. In the problem, AD = BC.)
| |
|
Triangles ADQ and BCQ are equal. Indeed, by construction, AD = BC and DQ = CQ. Now, on the surface, the proof proceeds smoothly. We have to consider two possible cases as shown the diagrams below:
We denote the angles in the quadrilateral by a single letter as in the corresponding vertex so that, by construction, A + B = 120°. Therefore, C + D = 240°. Taking up the left diagram:
| |
ADQ | = D + 60° |
| | = 240° - C + 60° |
| | = 300° - C |
| | = 360° - C - 60° |
| | = BCQ. |
|
It follows that ΔADQ = ΔBCQ. In particular, AQD = BQC. Thus, by removing and adding equal angles from and to CQD we still get an angle of 60°. Therefore, AQB = 60°. Since also AQ = BQ (as the corresponding sides in equal triangles), ΔABQ is indeed equilateral.
In the case of the right diagram above we similarly arrive at the same conclusion. Q.E.D.
A Flaw in the Proof
Now, this proof contains a subtle flaw. For the convenience sake, to simplify the process of drawing an equilic quadrilateral, I used the fact that the two sides AD and BC make a 60° angle so that their intersection S is bound to a 240° arc above AB. The statement we have attempted to prove is equivalent to stating that Q lies at the middle of that arc. The argument was based on the fact that their were just two possibilities: either C or D is inside ΔABQ whereas the other one is outside. However, if Q does not lie on the arc, two other possibilities have to be considered: either both C and D are inside or outside ΔABQ. It appears that we based our proof on an assumption equivalent to the statement to be proved.
A valid proof
References
- R. Honsberger, Mathematical Gems III, MAA, 1985, pp. 32-35
Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny
A Valid Proof
A rotation around Q through 60° maps D to C and A to, say, A' such that CA' and AD form a 60° angle. But the same is true of AD and CB. Therefore, A' = B. It follows that that rotation maps the whole ΔADQ on top of ΔBCQ. The triangle are then equal, their angles at Q are also equal, and we can proceed as before to conclude that AQB = 60°.
Besides establishing the fact it was intended to prove, the proof has a virtue of suggesting a generalization.
Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny
|