Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Ask a tutor for free
Learning Math Online

Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto  |  Bookstore  |  Contents  |  Amazon store  |  Term index  |  What changed?  |  Contact  |  Recommend
RSS Feed: Recent changes at CTK

Equilic Quadrilateral I: What is this about?
A Mathematical Droodle

 

This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet
What if applet does not run?

Discussion

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The applet may suggest the following statement due to Jack Garfunkel [Honsberger]:

  If an equilateral triangle DCQ is drawn on the side DC (away from AB) of an equilic quadrilateral ABCD (AD = BC), then the triangle ABQ is also equilateral.

(To remind, a quadrilateral ABCD is called equilic if it has a pair of equal opposite sides inclined 60° to each other. In the problem, AD = BC.)

 

This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet
What if applet does not run?

Triangles ADQ and BCQ are equal. Indeed, by construction, AD = BC and DQ = CQ. Now, on the surface, the proof proceeds smoothly. We have to consider two possible cases as shown the diagrams below:

 

We denote the angles in the quadrilateral by a single letter as in the corresponding vertex so that, by construction, angleA + angleB = 120°. Therefore, angleC + angleD = 240°. Taking up the left diagram:

 
angleADQ= angleD + 60°
 = 240° - angleC + 60°
 = 300° - angleC
 = 360° - angleC - 60°
 = angleBCQ.

It follows that ΔADQ = ΔBCQ. In particular, angleAQD = angleBQC. Thus, by removing and adding equal angles from and to angleCQD we still get an angle of 60°. Therefore, angleAQB = 60°. Since also AQ = BQ (as the corresponding sides in equal triangles), ΔABQ is indeed equilateral.

In the case of the right diagram above we similarly arrive at the same conclusion. Q.E.D.

A Flaw in the Proof

Now, this proof contains a subtle flaw. For the convenience sake, to simplify the process of drawing an equilic quadrilateral, I used the fact that the two sides AD and BC make a 60° angle so that their intersection S is bound to a 240° arc above AB. The statement we have attempted to prove is equivalent to stating that Q lies at the middle of that arc. The argument was based on the fact that their were just two possibilities: either C or D is inside ΔABQ whereas the other one is outside. However, if Q does not lie on the arc, two other possibilities have to be considered: either both C and D are inside or outside ΔABQ. It appears that we based our proof on an assumption equivalent to the statement to be proved.

A valid proof

References

  1. R. Honsberger, Mathematical Gems III, MAA, 1985, pp. 32-35

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Valid Proof

A rotation around Q through 60° maps D to C and A to, say, A' such that CA' and AD form a 60° angle. But the same is true of AD and CB. Therefore, A' = B. It follows that that rotation maps the whole ΔADQ on top of ΔBCQ. The triangle are then equal, their angles at Q are also equal, and we can proceed as before to conclude that angleAQB = 60°.

Besides establishing the fact it was intended to prove, the proof has a virtue of suggesting a generalization.

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

34386445Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK